This is Post 2 of my Seattle Transit Series: Sound Move
Sound Move is produced in collaboration with CreativeSystems of America. An independently-owned and operated collective, CreativeSystems of America aims to amplify voices of the American people.

If you’ve been keeping up with the latest in Seattle transit news, you’ll know about Sound Transit’s record-breaking $34 billion shortfall. A shortfall of this size will be devastating to Sound Transit, undermining their potential capability to complete voter-approved Sound Transit 3 projects. Sound Transit is currently reviewing the Enterprise Initiative, a cost-cutting plan to re-work Sound Transit’s finances.
In this initiative, there are a bunch of projects that Sound Transit is planning on deferring or reducing the scope of. This post is a reaction of sorts – answering the question of “Is this worth the deferral?”
Link Light Rail to Tacoma Dome
Status: Fully Funded
Although I understand why this project needs to get built, I can also see why this project could be deferred for a future phase. Tacoma to SeaTac trips are the main reason why this line should exist. In my mind, upgrades and improvements to Sounder S Line would be a much better investment, as the line links Tacoma to Seattle that makes much more sense. Link Light Rail would take much longer to get to Seattle, and I don’t know if it’s worth that investment. This section would also see very little ridership.
In a political sense, this project is highly unlikely to be deferred. Pierce County subarea voters have received very little improvements outside of the T Line extension, so this project will “recoup” Tacoma’s investment into regional transit.
Link Light Rail to Everett
Status: Fully Funded
This project, despite the abysmal rider projections is sorely needed for regional connectivity. The existing options, including Sound Transit Express lines and the Sounder N Line are relatively insufficient to support future rider growth. Snohomish County got its first light rail line back in 2024, and a connection to Everett would be a great investment to maintain regional connectivity. No complaints here, other than the line’s strange routing.
Link Light Rail to Issaquah and SOuth Kirkland
Status: Fully Funded but Delayed to 2050
This line would be an easy offshoot from the 2 Line as long as they follow the freeway routing. Although the line would be a lot more valuable if Kirkland wanted the line, it’s decently needed for more interconnectivity in East King Subregion. I doubt that it would be as impactful as Stride BRT, but as it stands I’m happy with the delay.
Link Light Rail to West Seattle
Status: Fully Funded without Avalon Station
This branch would bring pretty decent ridership for Link despite being so short, but I think Avalon should be put back onto the map to provide better connections to Burien or White Center. Alaska Junction is already served by the RapidRide C Line and the Link conection would be beneficial for the area.
Link Light Rail to Ballard
Status: Fully Funded to Seattle Center, Phase 2 to Ballard Deferred
This is a pretty big mistake. Ballard Link, including the Second Downtown Tunnel is a valuable opportunity to provide better connections in a transit-dependent area. Building the full link out to Ballard would provide way better regional opportunities for riders outside of the North King Subarea, as they can use Link as a part of a true transit corridor in Seattle. Although the costs are high, this one project will boost regional opportunities much further than a light rail line to Issaquah.
So far, the subarea structure of Sound Transit essentially means that this project is very unlikely to be fully funded by ST3, despite the fact that it is guaranteed to provide the best value for money. I understand that the political will to build this project is very much alive, but Seattle’s interests remain eaten up by the rest of the board that must advocate for their areas.
In the meantime, the proposal to build to Seattle Center would still benefit South Lake Union, so I’m happy that at least a stub line is being built. My fear is that the stub will exist in a Wilshire/Western-esque limbo of existence. My hope is that they’re able to prioritize the full buildout to Ballard before the political motivation to build it disappears.
Graham Street Station (Infill)
Status: Deferred (Design Work Funded)
Not a fan of this deferral. Subjectively, South Seattle has been f*cked over by the Link system because of this at-grade section. Despite that, it has still managed to prosper and maintain a lot of its character. Graham Street has been requested for years by the community, and would fill a particularly important gap along MLK Jr. Way. It’s a pretty “cheap” station (estimated at US$214M) that would greatly benefit the community. Seattle continues to alienate some of the city’s most marginalized neighborhoods, and the deferral of this station is a reminder of that fact. A proposal by Seattle Mayor Katie Wilson has proposed a “last-in” funding mechanism that would restore funding for this station, and I really hope it passes.
Boeing Access Road Station (Infill)
Status: Deferred (Design Work Funded)
If I’m honest, I’d rather see this station cancelled outright. For the estimated cost of US$425-475M, this station would serve basically nothing and has very little development potential. This is already an incredible waste of money, and it should be removed from the schedule altogether.
Sounder Improvements
Status: Deferred
A whole list of Sounder improvements, including capacity improvements for Sounder South, and an extension to DuPont are all proposed to be deferred. While it would be nice, the extension to DuPont is less of a priority than the Sounder South capacity improvements. Hourly frequencies between Tacoma and Seattle would be a dream, but I doubt BNSF would be co-operative for that amount of traffic.
Link Light Rail to Tacoma Community College
Status: Fully Funded but Delayed to 2043
I don’t know much about the T Line unfortunately, but the T Line’s Hilltop Extension has proven to be of great value to the City of Tacoma. Since the main priority for this line is economic development, keeping it on the table but extending the debt priority is probably the best outcome for this project.
What’s Next?
As of the date of publication, the Sound Transit Board is voting to approve or amend the Enterprise Initiative today (Thursday, 28 May). My hope is that we can find ways to lower soft costs and keep the transit momentum going in the Puget Sound. Seattle is on a great run with building and developing transit, and this momentum needs to be harvested for the next generation of projects.
Further rEading
Substitute Resolution No. R2026-11
Graham Street Station and the Failure of the Enterprise Initiative







